Low EV/EBITDA Screen

What Is EV/EBITDA?

EV/EBITDA — enterprise value divided by earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization — is one of the most widely used valuation multiples in professional finance. Unlike the P/E ratio, which is influenced by a company's capital structure and tax situation, EV/EBITDA is capital-structure-neutral: it compares the total value of the business (debt + equity − cash) to the cash earnings generated before financing and accounting choices. This makes it useful for comparing companies with different leverage profiles and across international markets with different tax rates.

The multiple became a standard tool in leveraged buyout (LBO) analysis during the 1980s. Private equity firms evaluating acquisition targets use EV/EBITDA to assess what multiple of cash earnings they are paying and whether the business can service the acquisition debt. The multiple essentially answers: at what cash-generation rate does the business need to operate to justify this price?

EV/EBITDA has several known shortcomings. EBITDA adds back depreciation and amortization under the premise that they are non-cash charges — but for businesses with significant physical assets, depreciation approximates the real cost of maintaining the asset base. A capital-intensive manufacturer with $100M of EBITDA and $60M of maintenance capex has very different economic earning power than a software company with $100M of EBITDA and $5M of capex. Warren Buffett has criticized EBITDA extensively for this reason, famously asking whether management believes "the tooth fairy pays for capital expenditures."

Despite this limitation, EV/EBITDA is more appropriate than P/E for industries with high depreciation loads (telecom, energy, real estate), for highly levered companies where the equity P/E is distorted by debt service, and for international comparisons where tax rates differ materially.

The criteria in plain English:

• EV/EBITDA below 8 — you are paying less than 8 years of pre-capex, pre-tax cash earnings
• EV/EBITDA above 0 — negative EBITDA produces a misleadingly low multiple
• EBITDA positive — the business is operationally cash-generative before capex
• Moderate leverage — very high debt inflates EV without reflecting a business problem

A low EV/EBITDA can reflect genuine undervaluation, high near-term capex requirements that depress the economic value of the EBITDA, industry-level distress, or structural decline. Context from the source filings is essential.

---

How to Run This Screen in GeminIQ

Step 1. Open the GeminIQ Screener

Step 2. Add the following filters:

Filter	Operator	Value
EV/EBITDA TTM	≤	8
EV/EBITDA TTM	≥	1
EBITDA	≥	1

The EV/EBITDA TTM floor of 1 removes companies with negative EBITDA that produce negative (and meaningless) multiples. The EBITDA floor confirms EBITDA is positive at the absolute level.

Step 3. Set Sort By to EV/EBITDA TTM, direction Ascending — cheapest multiple first.

Step 4. To identify businesses where low EV/EBITDA reflects genuine value rather than high capex requirements, add a profitability overlay:

Filter	Operator	Value
Free Cash Flow Yield TTM	≥	5

Companies with both a low EV/EBITDA and a high FCF yield are businesses where EBITDA and free cash flow are reasonably close — meaning depreciation is not masking significant real capital requirements.

GeminIQ Tip: Use GeminIQ's Calculated Metrics view to compare EV/EBITDA TTM against EV/EBIT TTM for each candidate. A large gap between the two multiples indicates high depreciation and amortization relative to EBITDA — this is the signature of a capital-intensive or acquisitive business where EBITDA significantly overstates true economic earning power.

---

What Aggregator Data Misses for This Screen

Enterprise value construction. EV is typically calculated as market cap + total debt − cash. The choices that go into this calculation vary significantly across platforms:

• Is preferred stock included in debt?
• Are operating lease liabilities (post-ASC 842) included in debt?
• Is the full minority interest included?
• Are certain off-balance-sheet liabilities (pension deficits, contingent liabilities) included?

Aggregators make different choices on all of these. A company with $2B of operating lease liabilities and $500M of pension obligations could show EV/EBITDA of 6.5x on one platform and 9.0x on another, depending entirely on what the platform includes in enterprise value. GeminIQ's enterprise value is constructed from as-filed balance sheet components, and the individual components (debt, cash, leases, minority interest) are visible and filterable.

EBITDA normalization. Aggregators commonly report "adjusted EBITDA" rather than the GAAP-derived figure, adding back stock-based compensation, restructuring charges, and sometimes customer acquisition costs or R&D. A company with GAAP EBITDA of $800M but adjusted EBITDA of $1.2B will show very different multiples. GeminIQ's EBITDA is derived from as-filed operating income plus depreciation and amortization, without adjustments — the same basis used in most academic finance research.

Amortization of acquired intangibles. Companies that grow through M&A carry significant amortization of acquired intangibles, which is a real accounting expense but has no cash impact. Aggregators sometimes strip this from EBITDA, creating an "EBITA" or "adjusted EBITDA" figure that makes acquisitive companies look cheaper. The as-filed D&A figure includes this amortization. Whether to add it back is an analytical choice — GeminIQ lets you see both the EBITDA and the EBIT multiple (which does not add back D&A) so you can make the comparison yourself.

---

GeminIQ builds its financial statement database from raw SEC filings, not from third-party financial data APIs.

This screen is educational and does not constitute investment advice. Past performance of any strategy does not guarantee future results.